Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Where Identity Meets Society

(This piece was written for my Sexuality & Society class and reflects my personal experiences and evolving understanding of identity. I’m sharing it here as part of my larger writing journey.)

Sexuality is often talked about as something deeply personal or private, shaped by inner feelings, hormones, and individual experiences. But sociologists argue that sexuality is also a product of social forces: religion, gender norms, family, community expectations, and the cultural scripts that tell us what desires are “normal” and which ones must be silenced. When I look back on my own sexual development, I can clearly see how these social forces shaped, restricted, and ultimately delayed my understanding of who I am. My sexuality did not form in a vacuum. It formed within a conservative Mormon family, in a rigidly gendered religious world, and inside a heterosexual marriage I felt obligated to enter. Only as an adult, after trauma, self‑reflection, and leaving religion, did I begin to understand that I am a nonbinary person who has always been attracted to women. My sexual biography is not simply a story about desire; it is a story about socialization, control, repression, and eventual liberation.

I was born and raised in the Netherlands, but even before I entered the United States, my gender experience was already atypical within the expectations around me. I grew up wanting to dress like my brothers, act like them, and spend my days climbing trees, getting dirty, and avoiding anything coded as “girly.” Sociology teaches that gender is not just biological but social, it is learned through reinforcement, expectations, and parenting (Sheff & Hammers, Privilege of Perversities). My early discomfort with gender norms wasn’t recognized as legitimate. Instead, it was treated as a phase or something that would go away. The Mormon faith my family practiced added another layer of gendered expectation. In Mormon culture, gender roles are extremely rigid: boys are taught to grow into priesthood‑holding leaders, while girls are taught to become nurturing wives and mothers. Even as a child, I already felt pressure to fit into this narrow definition of womanhood, even though my body and identity never aligned with it. I did not yet have language for feeling nonbinary, but I understood deeply that being myself was not allowed.

Around age 14, I realized I liked girls. This awareness came naturally, quietly, and without shame, until I told my mother. Her immediate shutdown of my feelings (“Mormons are not gay”) taught me two sociological lessons at once: my desires were unacceptable, and my survival in the family depended on suppressing them. After this moment, I buried my attraction to women so deeply that I genuinely forgot it for long periods of time. Instead, I tried to “fix” myself through prayer, self‑denial, and obedience to religious ideals. In class we learned about sexual scripts and how society defines what counts as “normal,” such as in Greta Christina’s “Are We Having Sex Now or What?” where she shows that society polices what counts as “real sex.” My confession to my mom made her realize I was looking outside of what my church counted as normal, and so my desires and thoughts needed to be shut down immediately.

The Mormon Church, like many institutions, exerts religious social control, influencing members’ sexuality through teachings about purity, modesty, marriage, and eternal roles. I internalized the message that any deviation from heterosexuality was sinful, broken, or a sign of spiritual failure. I dated one boy briefly due to peer pressure, but the attraction was never real. Looking back, my teenage years show how powerful social institutions are in shaping sexual identity. I did not reject my sexuality because it felt wrong, I rejected it because my community taught me that my salvation depended on denying it.

After moving to the U.S. at seventeen and attending college, I tried to blend in with my roommates and community. I tried to go on dates with boys, but every experience felt emotionally empty. Still, because Mormon teachings emphasized heterosexual marriage as a divine commandment, I believed I had no choice. The boy who lived across the street from my parents pursued me aggressively after I returned from my Mormon mission. Saying no felt impossible. Mormon culture strongly socializes women to prioritize marriage, to accept male pursuit, and to take on emotional and spiritual responsibility for men. Marrying him was not a free romantic choice, it was a sociologically conditioned response to my religious upbringing, cultural expectations, and lack of support for my real identity.

Inside the marriage, my sexual orientation became painfully clear through sexual dissociation. I never enjoyed sex and wanted it less and less. My husband blamed me, saying I wasn’t emotionally present. He cheated on me multiple times and insisted his infidelity was my fault. This reflects two sociological themes: victim‑blaming in patriarchal structures (Sheff & Hammers, The Privilege of Perversities), and the expectation that wives exist to meet men’s needs (Greta Christina, Are We Having Sex Now or What?). Because my marriage reflected the gendered power imbalance I had been taught to accept, I believed for years that I was the problem. Becoming a mother grounded my life in responsibility and caretaking. Within Mormon gender ideology, motherhood is the highest calling for women, and I internalized this role. I gave everything, emotionally, physically, and financially, to keep the household functioning while my husband’s emotional abuse intensified. During this period, I lost sight of who I was outside the roles of “wife” and “mother.” My sexual identity remained repressed. Instead of honoring my attraction to women, I blamed myself for not wanting my husband. I interpreted my lack of attraction as personal inadequacy, not as evidence of my lesbian orientation. This is a direct effect of compulsory heterosexuality and religious conditioning.

Leaving my marriage and the Mormon Church opened the door for self‑reflection. After the divorce, memories of my early crushes on girls resurfaced. I noticed again the instinctive pull I had always felt toward women, emotionally, aesthetically, romantically, and sexually. I finally admitted to myself, and later to my daughters, that I had always liked girls. They accepted me instantly, a stark contrast to the reactions I’d grown up with. This part of my biography reflects identity reconstruction, where individuals reshape the story of their life once oppressive structures are removed (Robbins, Low & Query, A Qualitative Exploration of the Coming Out Process for Asexual Individuals). Free from religious pressure and heterosexual marriage, I could finally understand myself clearly: I am a nonbinary person attracted to women. Looking back, I see how my nationality, gender assignment, religion, and sexuality are intersected to shape the constraints on my sexual identity. My discomfort with my body, especially my chest, and my lifelong preference for masculine or androgynous clothing were early signs of my nonbinary identity. For years, I suppressed my discomfort because Mormon teachings framed gender as eternal and unchanging. Once I left those teachings behind, I allowed myself to explore presentation: short hair, piercings, tattoos, and clothing that felt like me. Using they/them pronouns at work was a transformative moment. It allowed me to align my inner reality with my public self. I am not a woman. I am not a man. I am me.

My daughters fully accept me, and their support demonstrates how generational shifts in attitudes toward gender and sexuality can create more affirming environments. However, my extended family remains conservative and Mormon, and I expect little acceptance from them. Their likely reactions mirror the experiences of others in my family, like my nieces whose identities have been dismissed with phrases like “it’s just a phase.” According to Sheff & Hammers in “The Privilege of Perversities,” people in dominant social groups (white, straight, middle-class) experience privilege in sexual minority spaces. Marginalized people face stigma, exclusion, misrecognition, and misunderstanding. The fear of judgment, especially around choosing a more fitting name, shows how social pressure continues to shape even my adult choices. Even after escape, the old norms echo. Robbins, Low & Query in “A Qualitative Exploration of the Coming Out Process for Asexual Individuals,” found negative reactions such as disbelief and dismissal were prominent reactions asexual individuals received. My mother had dismissed me, and my extended family had dismissed some of my nieces who had tried to come out as well. I noticed the patterns and knew I would most likely never be fully accepted by my family.

My sexual identity, gender identity, and sense of self were profoundly shaped by religion, family, culture, and gender expectations. Mormonism taught me to deny my attraction to women and forced me into heterosexuality. Gender norms taught me to perform femininity even when it felt wrong. Marriage taught me to prioritize someone else’s needs over my own. But leaving those structures taught me something even more powerful: sexuality and gender are not fixed by others, they are discovered, reclaimed, and lived. From a sociological perspective, my life story shows how forces like religion, gender socialization, compulsory heterosexuality, and family expectations can shape sexual development. But it also shows that individuals can break free from those forces. Today, I live as myself: a nonbinary person who loves women, a survivor who rebuilt their life, and someone who finally understands that my sexuality was never broken, it was simply hidden under layers of social control.

 

Sources:

Christina, G. (2002). Are we having sex now or what? In M. Stombler et al. (Eds.), Sex matters: The sexuality and society reader (pp. 5-8). 

Robbins, N. K., Low, K. G., & Query, A. N. (2016). A qualitative exploration of the “coming out” process for asexual individuals. In M. Stombler et al. (Eds.), Sex matters: The sexuality and society reader (pp. 352-362).

Sheff, E., & Hammers, C. (2011). The privilege of perversities: Race, class, and education among sexual minorities. In M. Stombler et al. (Eds.), Sex matters: The sexuality and society reader (pp. 402-415).



[Written for SOC 2750R class UVU Spring 2026]
aB . All Rights Reserved . 2026