Showing posts with label Race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Race. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2025

Sociology Class Reading Response Two

      Most of the readings for this module are from Eddie Glaude, except one from John Dewey. They all flow together nicely and work as Eddie Glaude brings John Dewey and other scholars into his writings. The first article, “Towards a New Individualism” by John Dewey, focused on the changes we have seen in America from old individualism to a new individualism. He focused on a remaking of society that has been the driving power of America and the enthusiasm of a new generation. Dewey’s answer to the success of those thriving was education, and that the government should focus more on helping individuals attain education so they could help sustain and build up their communities. “In a Shade of Blue,” by Eddie Glaude, focused on the silence of race in the United States. He gives the example of Toni Morrison’s novel Beloved, where tragedy and evil are understood to be a part of the mortal exigencies of life. The reality of life and race have shaped this country in such a way that we would rather erase the past than confront it, thus making books like those written by Toni Morrison all the more powerful and important for future generations. We also read two chapters in “An Uncommon Faith,” also written by Eddie Glaude. In chapter 1, he talks about Pragmatism and African American Religion in general. He explains that a pragmatist will look for concrete facts, action, and power, but when it comes to religion, a pragmatist will usually question dogma as it is not evidence-based. He brings Dewey into his writings here as well as James Baldwin, Cornel West, and W.E.B. Du Bois, as they all have different views on pragmatism and African American religion. In chapter 3, Glaude talks about meliorism, piety, double consciousness, and Chastened Pragmatic Religious Naturalism, which fascinated me.

    The last two concepts above were presented originally by W.E.B. Du Bois, and Glaude believes that Du Bois provides a great point of view that is similar between John Dewey and James Baldwin and is thus worth talking about. I really liked both of them and think they can still be seen today in a lot of ways. Double consciousness is an internal conflict concept talked about by Du Bois in 1903. African Americans were rejected by American life, yet they had a strong desire to be included in it. This created huge psychological struggles in a culture that was dominated by oppression, humiliation, racism, and conversion to a white man's religion. Du Bois was aware of the divide between his world and the world around him and that it could be saved depending on the choices, actions, and efforts of individuals (meliorism). “The natural world is diseased, distorted, deformed, and not naturally but by human actions toward black people”. Du Bois knew that the black man had always been controlled by others and that his destiny and identity had never been his own. “The world we inhabit can be saved, the hell black folks catch can be undone if we only act (without guarantee of satisfactory outcomes).” I think this entire concept can be tied back to the first article by John Dewey, “Towards a New Individualism,” as he believes that education can be a strong indicator of control and power in your community for change. We need to make sure every generation, no matter your race or status, is educated on the past, including the tragedies and evils of slavery that existed in America, as this will create a more informed, empathetic, and cultured future society for all.

Sources:

Dewey, J (1930). Individualism Old and New. Minton, Balch & Company.

Glaude, E. S., Jr. (2018). An Uncommon faith: A pragmatic approach to the study of African American religion. University of Georgia Press.

Glaude, E. S., Jr. (2007). In a Shade of blue: Pragmatism and the Politics of Black America. University of Chicago Press.


[Written for SOC 4100 class UVU Spring 2025]
aB . All Rights Reserved . 2025


Monday, March 3, 2025

Sociology Class Reading Response

    For our first module, we read Chapters 1, 2, and 4 of Age of Fracture by Daniel T. Rogers. Here is my reading response:

    Age of Fracture by Daniel T. Rodgers explains the different shifts in intellectual life during the late 20th Century. Chapter One talks about a shift from collectivism to individualism, the "me decade". This chapter also focused on changes in presidential speeches, especially Reagan, as he emphasized personal responsibility and a reduced role for the government, as seen in his first inaugural address in 1981. Reagan’s communication style and ability to connect with the people evoked emotions throughout his speeches, by which he could influence public opinion in ways no previous president ever had. Chapter Two focuses more on the shift from Keynesian economics to market-oriented and supply-side economics. Instead of letting the government intervene and manage everything, deregulation happened, a reduction in taxes, and there were more individual decision-making powers. Chapter Four talks about the shift in social and political thought when it comes to race and identity. Race was now seen as a social construct rather than a fixed biological category, and scholars emphasized the role that all cultures play in shaping social realities. During the late 20th Century, marginalized groups began to assert their identities and demand recognition and rights while intellectuals and activists such as Martin Luther King Jr, Alex Haley, W.E.B. Du Bois, Booker T. Washington, Jesse Jackson, Toni Morrison, Cornel West, Maya Angelou, James Baldwin, Alice Walker, and many others, influenced and reshaped the discourse around race and identity for years to come.

    As I was reading chapter four, many of the names of intellectuals and activists were very familiar to me. I am an avid reader, especially when it comes to biographies, memoirs, non-fiction, or historical fiction. The names of Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, Maya Angelou, Alex Haley, and James Baldwin were all familiar because I have read their books as they are now banned. You may be familiar with some of the titles as they used to be required reading in school some time ago. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, Roots, Beloved, The Bluest Eyes, Go Tell It to the Mountain, and The Color Purple are just some of the titles that you may have heard of. Many of these books are critical as they talk about slavery and the violence that occurred that caused significant historical trauma that should not be forgotten or swept under the rug. The powerful storytelling in each of these works is what makes them masterful and deserving of a place amongst other great authors. Banning books limits our access to diverse cultures, histories, and viewpoints, which is essential for fostering empathy and tolerance. Many of the banned books today reflect the period in which they were written, so banning them essentially erases important parts of history that need to be talked about, remembered, and not forgotten.


[Written for SOC 4100 class UVU Spring 2025]
aB . All Rights Reserved . 2025