Showing posts with label Equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Equality. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2025

Sociology Class Reading Response Two

      Most of the readings for this module are from Eddie Glaude, except one from John Dewey. They all flow together nicely and work as Eddie Glaude brings John Dewey and other scholars into his writings. The first article, “Towards a New Individualism” by John Dewey, focused on the changes we have seen in America from old individualism to a new individualism. He focused on a remaking of society that has been the driving power of America and the enthusiasm of a new generation. Dewey’s answer to the success of those thriving was education, and that the government should focus more on helping individuals attain education so they could help sustain and build up their communities. “In a Shade of Blue,” by Eddie Glaude, focused on the silence of race in the United States. He gives the example of Toni Morrison’s novel Beloved, where tragedy and evil are understood to be a part of the mortal exigencies of life. The reality of life and race have shaped this country in such a way that we would rather erase the past than confront it, thus making books like those written by Toni Morrison all the more powerful and important for future generations. We also read two chapters in “An Uncommon Faith,” also written by Eddie Glaude. In chapter 1, he talks about Pragmatism and African American Religion in general. He explains that a pragmatist will look for concrete facts, action, and power, but when it comes to religion, a pragmatist will usually question dogma as it is not evidence-based. He brings Dewey into his writings here as well as James Baldwin, Cornel West, and W.E.B. Du Bois, as they all have different views on pragmatism and African American religion. In chapter 3, Glaude talks about meliorism, piety, double consciousness, and Chastened Pragmatic Religious Naturalism, which fascinated me.

    The last two concepts above were presented originally by W.E.B. Du Bois, and Glaude believes that Du Bois provides a great point of view that is similar between John Dewey and James Baldwin and is thus worth talking about. I really liked both of them and think they can still be seen today in a lot of ways. Double consciousness is an internal conflict concept talked about by Du Bois in 1903. African Americans were rejected by American life, yet they had a strong desire to be included in it. This created huge psychological struggles in a culture that was dominated by oppression, humiliation, racism, and conversion to a white man's religion. Du Bois was aware of the divide between his world and the world around him and that it could be saved depending on the choices, actions, and efforts of individuals (meliorism). “The natural world is diseased, distorted, deformed, and not naturally but by human actions toward black people”. Du Bois knew that the black man had always been controlled by others and that his destiny and identity had never been his own. “The world we inhabit can be saved, the hell black folks catch can be undone if we only act (without guarantee of satisfactory outcomes).” I think this entire concept can be tied back to the first article by John Dewey, “Towards a New Individualism,” as he believes that education can be a strong indicator of control and power in your community for change. We need to make sure every generation, no matter your race or status, is educated on the past, including the tragedies and evils of slavery that existed in America, as this will create a more informed, empathetic, and cultured future society for all.

Sources:

Dewey, J (1930). Individualism Old and New. Minton, Balch & Company.

Glaude, E. S., Jr. (2018). An Uncommon faith: A pragmatic approach to the study of African American religion. University of Georgia Press.

Glaude, E. S., Jr. (2007). In a Shade of blue: Pragmatism and the Politics of Black America. University of Chicago Press.


[Written for SOC 4100 class UVU Spring 2025]
aB . All Rights Reserved . 2025


Tuesday, July 18, 2023

Women, Politics, and LGBTQ+ issues in Utah

Question: 
    Prior to 1900, Utah history was marked by violent conflict and a “weird” dominant culture marked by polygamy, Christian heresy, and theocracy. We have discussed the many ways in which Utah has opened-up to the outside and become more integrated into the United States. Yet a recent report finds Utah is the worst state in the nation when it concerns women’s equality (https://etvnews.com/wallethub-reports-womens-equality-in-utah-worst-in-the-nation/). The LDS Church policies on LGBTQ+ women’s equality, gender roles, and dissent are hotly debated. Compare conflict before 1900 with more recent conflicts, especially the major forms of conflict and accommodation to the United States.


My Response Essay:
    The walletHub article talks about three different key indicators namely workplace environment, education and health, and political empowerment. I believe this all stems back to the beginning of Utah. The Mormon settlers that inhabited Utah in 1847 came with the idea that women were less than men. The religion they were a part of was a very patriarchal religion and women were there to serve the men in their capacities. Leaders of the Mormon church have always indicated that women had a good place in the church but their main responsibilities lay in raising children, keeping the home, and supporting the men in everything they did. Even today in 2023 the church leaders still emphasize that a woman’s role is to be a mother first and to be obedient to her husband and the other priesthood holders. With this mindset the pioneers came to Utah and were raising their children with that same belief. Mormon leaders emphasized these beliefs every chance they had and so the Mormons today still have the same preconceived notions that men are in charge and women are there to support them and bear their children. Mormon theology backs up the beliefs from the past and today by explaining that men can marry many women in the temple and be sealed to them into the eternities and that those women will bear them many children so they can populate their own earth one day. The church has always opposed things that are different from their orthodox Christian beliefs. They are strong opponents on women’s rights when it comes to abortion and letting a woman make those decisions on her own.

    The majority of politicians in office in Utah are republican and Mormon at the same time and you can tell they vote based on their religious beliefs a lot. When it comes to LGBTQ+ issues in Utah you see the same results as once again the politicians in office vote according to their religious belief that same sex attraction is a sin and that marriage should only be between a man and a woman as ordained by God. I have realized over the years that separation of church and state is not being practiced in Utah. Because the Mormon church has such a strong beginning here and because so many of the people who live in Utah are Mormons the laws that seem to get passed affect those who are not Mormon, or different from Mormons, more than the Mormons themselves. Anyone who is not a conservative republican has a hard time winning a political seat in Utah. Last year Evan McMullin tried to unseat a longtime Republican senator and got close. He had the best numbers for a Democrat since 1976.

    When it comes to LGBTQ+ issues in Utah, the church has taken a neutral stance in public by saying they love everyone but in private they are still fighting against LGBTQ+ rights. In 2008 the church fought hard to pass Prop 8 in California and they urged members everywhere to fight for family values and to ban gay marriage. “We ask that you do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time to assure that marriage in California is legally defined as being between a man and a woman. Our best efforts are required to preserve the sacred institution of marriage”. (https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/california-and-same-sex-marriage) These kinds of statements are repeated in many church gatherings and over the pulpit in General Conference sessions. Members are told repeatedly that being gay is a sin and that Mormons should not support the rights of those living that lifestyle. Because these things are said over and over and many Mormons believe their prophets words are law, the LGBTQ+ community in Utah gets a lot of hate. I live in Provo and go to events put on by LGBTQ+ BYU students to support them and there are always people protesting their existence. I have a daughter who is part of the LGBTQ+ community and she would get hate speech from kids at school who would then on Sunday be sitting in the same church building as her. The leaders of the Mormon church have a lot of influence with their words as many Mormons follow whatever is being said blindly. Because of this people who are different in Utah have a harder time being seen and heard and are constantly put down by those who believe they are superior to them because they are Mormon.

    When it comes to politics in Utah, women are not represented equally to men. Utah has not had a female senator and they currently don’t have any women serving in Congress. Because most women in Utah are expected to be mothers first a lot of women don’t even finish college. They are taught from a young age to be a mother and to not put off getting married or having kids to finish their education. Utah is also home to a lot of large families and so women are kept busy with the many children they bring into their home. This is hard for women who get divorced as a Mormon as most of the time they don’t have an education or experience to get a good job that will allow them to be able to raise their kids without having to work multiple menial jobs. I myself am one of those women who stopped my education when I got married to have kids. I got divorced after 20 years of marriage and am now back in college to finish the degree I started in 1994. I have multiple friends who are in the same boat as it was always stressed to them that being a mother was more important than anything else and now they are trying to make ends meet while raising their kids alone.

    The examples of the pioneer women that came to Utah is what still holds true to many today. Many Mormons still believe they need to be in the background while their priesthood holder takes care of everything. They believe they are less than men and that they have no place outside of the home. They don’t see themselves in politics or fighting for change. I can however see that things are slowly changing as the younger generation of women now see things a little bit different from their parents. I am proud of my two daughters who see the inequalities for women and don’t just accept it as fact. They are part of a generation that will change the way Utah sees their women. They are more tolerant when it comes to rights for everyone and they seem to want smaller families and an education as they will most likely also need to work alongside their husbands to make enough money. Hopefully this trend will continue in Utah as they catch up a little more to the rest of the country when it comes to women’s rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and really equality for everyone no matter who they are.


[Written for HIST 3260 class UVU Summer 2023]
aB . All Right Reserved . 2023

Sunday, July 16, 2023

How did the demands and/or experiences of everyday people create today’s America?

    When we started this class we began right after the Civil War had concluded in the United States. Americans already knew what it felt like to fight for their freedoms when their ancestors came to this new nation and established a free country. During the civil war again they were reminded that freedom was something to fight and die for. Those that were not free saw the possibilities out there and knew that they too could fight for this. From the beginning the people that have occupied this nation have fought to be seen and heard as equals. Wars and conflicts have raged about this issue since the beginning and have shaped this nation along the way.

    During the reconstruction era amendments were passed to abolish slavery and give voting rights to many of those who had never had them before. While not everyone was free and equal or could partake of these new changes, we can see that America was slowly heading in the right direction. Once African-Americans saw that they too could have a voice and be part of this nation, they never stopped fighting to be equal. Despite the dangers, southern blacks eagerly pursued emancipation. They moved; they married; they attended school; they demanded wages; they refused to work for whites; they gathered together their families; they created black churches and civic associations; they held political meetings. (Hewitt and Lawson, 464)

    During the Progressive Period women started to find their voice and fight for equality as well. The government went through a lot of reform and added protections for consumers, congress decided to ban child labor and many women's organizations were started. More equality was obtained for workers with 8 hour work days and overtime. The NAACP was established during the Progressive period as well and they fought to make African-Americans more equal as they still were not considered so. Many other organizations sprung into action to also fight for the rights for different minorities living in this nation. Progressives maintained a passion for change as a means of improving the nation. (Hewitt and Lawson, 637)

    A lot more changes for equality came later during the 1960s and 1970s when the civil rights act was passed and the women's movements were in full swing. Martin Luther King Jr. advocated for equal rights for African-Americans up until the day he was assassinated. The work did not stop with his death, it just propelled the cause forward to make sure everyone was seen as equals in this country. The varieties of political protest and cultural dissent emboldened other oppressed groups to emancipate themselves. Women, Latinos, Native Americans, and gay Americans all launched liberation movements. (Hewitt and Lawson, 912)

    The fight for equality and freedom really started well before this country was founded. The reason people fled from England and wanted to establish a new free nation was because they didn’t feel free. I believe the need for freedom and to be seen as equals is a human desire that never goes away. Once we awoke that so long ago we have not been able to stop the flood of events that have happened since then and have paved the way for the freedoms we all enjoy today. While there are still many things in this country that do not make us all equals, we know that we will never stop fighting for them to be equal. This ingrained sense of justice and need for equality is what continues to propel organizations and people to fight for those that are still facing discrimination and injustice even today.


Source:
Hewitt, Nancy A., Lawson, Steven F. (2021) Exploring American Histories, Volume 2 Bedford/St. Martin’s


[Written for SOC 1020 class UVU Spring 2023]
aB . All Right Reserved . 2023